Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Peru: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Peru
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 46.25 % against 46.22 % in Peru, a difference of 0.03 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Peru ranks 105th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.72 % | 47.49 % | 1.23 % | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 37.02 % | 46.47 % | 9.45 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 26.89 % | 42.12 % | 15.23 % | Peru |
| 2020s | 44.04 % | 41.44 % | 2.6 % | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Peru?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 46.25 % against 46.22 % in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 0.03 %, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Peru ranks 105th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).