Botswana vs Turkmenistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Botswana
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 12.65 % against 11.24 % in Botswana, a difference of 1.41 %.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Botswana ranks 191st and Turkmenistan ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.46 % | 58.55 % | 36.09 % | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 11.97 % | 46.41 % | 34.43 % | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 10.72 % | 20.77 % | 10.05 % | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 15.87 % | 18.97 % | 3.1 % | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Botswana or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 12.65 % against 11.24 % in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Botswana and Turkmenistan?
- 1.41 %, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Turkmenistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Botswana ranks 191st and Turkmenistan ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).