Brazil vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency

Brazil
73.09 %
in 2023
Serbia
73.33 %
in 2023
Brazil rank
54th
Serbia rank
53rd

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time

  • Brazil
  • Serbia
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 73.33 % against 73.09 % in Brazil, a difference of 0.24 %.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 53rd of 201 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 72.57 % 52.6 % 19.96 % Brazil
2010s 73.68 % 64.15 % 9.53 % Brazil
2020s 69.9 % 69.5 % 0.3983 % Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Brazil or Serbia?
Serbia, at 73.33 % against 73.09 % in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Brazil and Serbia?
0.24 %, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
Brazil ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).