Cabo Verde vs Fiji: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Cabo Verde
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 84.08 % against 17.68 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 66.4 %.
That makes Fiji's figure about 4.8 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Fiji ranks 26th of 29 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 57.38 % | 197.19 % | 139.81 % | Fiji |
| 1970s | 39.35 % | 126.07 % | 86.72 % | Fiji |
| 1980s | 26 % | 111.56 % | 85.56 % | Fiji |
| 1990s | 13.75 % | 112.5 % | 98.76 % | Fiji |
| 2000s | 20.27 % | 136.22 % | 115.95 % | Fiji |
| 2010s | 22.16 % | 88.91 % | 66.74 % | Fiji |
| 2020s | 18.35 % | 89.17 % | 70.83 % | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Cabo Verde or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 84.08 % against 17.68 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Cabo Verde and Fiji?
- 66.4 %, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Fiji?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Fiji rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Fiji ranks 26th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).