Cabo Verde vs Georgia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Cabo Verde
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 21.4 % against 17.68 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 3.72 %.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 181st and Georgia ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.73 % | 30.23 % | 17.51 % | Georgia |
| 2000s | 20.27 % | 32 % | 11.73 % | Georgia |
| 2010s | 22.16 % | 28.87 % | 6.71 % | Georgia |
| 2020s | 18.35 % | 21.63 % | 3.28 % | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Cabo Verde or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 21.4 % against 17.68 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Cabo Verde and Georgia?
- 3.72 %, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Georgia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Cabo Verde ranks 181st and Georgia ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).