Caribbean vs Hungary: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Caribbean
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 90.21 % against 89.06 % in Caribbean, a difference of 1.15 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 29th and Hungary ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 100.23 % | 36.02 % | 64.21 % | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 84.31 % | 29.11 % | 55.21 % | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 70.94 % | 34.22 % | 36.72 % | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 69.79 % | 55.89 % | 13.9 % | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 70.99 % | 59.92 % | 11.07 % | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 67.24 % | 63.38 % | 3.85 % | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 76.89 % | 62.17 % | 14.72 % | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Caribbean or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 90.21 % against 89.06 % in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Caribbean and Hungary?
- 1.15 %, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Hungary rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Caribbean ranks 29th and Hungary ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).