Colombia vs Lesotho: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Colombia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 39.12 % against 38.46 % in Lesotho, a difference of 0.66 %.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Colombia ranks 126th and Lesotho ranks 129th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 63.76 % | 89.52 % | 25.76 % | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 59.69 % | 70.32 % | 10.63 % | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 53.71 % | 56.3 % | 2.59 % | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 44.22 % | 48.32 % | 4.1 % | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 40.5 % | 31.88 % | 8.62 % | Colombia |
| 2010s | 36.47 % | 34.01 % | 2.46 % | Colombia |
| 2020s | 38.85 % | 27.83 % | 11.03 % | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Colombia or Lesotho?
- Colombia, at 39.12 % against 38.46 % in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Colombia and Lesotho?
- 0.66 %, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Lesotho rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Colombia ranks 126th and Lesotho ranks 129th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).