Congo vs Eastern Asia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Congo
- Eastern Asia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 83.1 % against 45.96 % in Eastern Asia, a difference of 37.14 %.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.8 times Eastern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 27th and Eastern Asia ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eastern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 84.78 % | 59.37 % | 25.41 % | Congo |
| 1970s | 68.88 % | 48.55 % | 20.33 % | Congo |
| 1980s | 80.26 % | 37.01 % | 43.25 % | Congo |
| 1990s | 72.43 % | 34.31 % | 38.12 % | Congo |
| 2000s | 76.56 % | 33.05 % | 43.51 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 86.57 % | 38.81 % | 47.75 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 78.5 % | 46.29 % | 32.21 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Congo or Eastern Asia?
- Congo, at 83.1 % against 45.96 % in Eastern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Congo and Eastern Asia?
- 37.14 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eastern Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eastern Asia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Congo ranks 27th and Eastern Asia ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).