Congo vs Southern Europe: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Congo
- Southern Europe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 83.1 % against 37.54 % in Southern Europe, a difference of 45.56 %.
That makes Congo's figure about 2.2 times Southern Europe's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 34th and Southern Europe ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Southern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 84.78 % | 38.74 % | 46.04 % | Congo |
| 1970s | 68.88 % | 32.54 % | 36.34 % | Congo |
| 1980s | 80.26 % | 31.96 % | 48.31 % | Congo |
| 1990s | 72.43 % | 35.43 % | 37 % | Congo |
| 2000s | 76.56 % | 38.41 % | 38.15 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 86.57 % | 40.5 % | 46.07 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 78.5 % | 42.21 % | 36.29 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Congo or Southern Europe?
- Congo, at 83.1 % against 37.54 % in Southern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Congo and Southern Europe?
- 45.56 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Southern Europe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Southern Europe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Congo ranks 34th and Southern Europe ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).