Czechia vs Mozambique: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Czechia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 58.39 % against 58.11 % in Mozambique, a difference of 0.28 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mozambique ahead.
Czechia ranks 82nd and Mozambique ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.38 % | 64.67 % | 21.28 % | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 47.29 % | 66.85 % | 19.56 % | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 45.17 % | 64.21 % | 19.03 % | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 54.28 % | 61.69 % | 7.41 % | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Czechia or Mozambique?
- Czechia, at 58.39 % against 58.11 % in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Czechia and Mozambique?
- 0.28 %, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mozambique?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Mozambique rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Czechia ranks 82nd and Mozambique ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).