Czechoslovakia vs Ecuador: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 41.6 % against 39.4 % in Ecuador, a difference of 2.2 %.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 120th and Ecuador ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30.27 % | 84.04 % | 53.78 % | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 26.29 % | 53.34 % | 27.06 % | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 26.35 % | 46.36 % | 20.01 % | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 39.36 % | 48.27 % | 8.92 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Czechoslovakia or Ecuador?
- Czechoslovakia, at 41.6 % against 39.4 % in Ecuador as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Czechoslovakia and Ecuador?
- 2.2 %, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Ecuador?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Ecuador rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 120th and Ecuador ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).