Czechoslovakia vs Sudan (former): Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 42.46 % against 41.6 % in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.86 %.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 131st and Sudan (former) ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30.27 % | 60.52 % | 30.25 % | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 26.29 % | 56.84 % | 30.55 % | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 26.35 % | 49.98 % | 23.63 % | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 39.36 % | 56.97 % | 17.62 % | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Czechoslovakia or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 42.46 % against 41.6 % in Czechoslovakia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Czechoslovakia and Sudan (former)?
- 0.86 %, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Sudan (former)?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 131st and Sudan (former) ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).