Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency

Democratic Republic of the Congo
97.44 %
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
141.58 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
5th
Equatorial Guinea rank
8th

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
5075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 141.58 % against 97.44 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 44.14 %.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 8th of 18 regions.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 104.14 % 110.55 % 6.42 % Equatorial Guinea
1970s 93.94 % 89.66 % 4.29 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 98.33 % 113.11 % 14.78 % Equatorial Guinea
1990s 96.94 % 117.15 % 20.21 % Equatorial Guinea
2000s 96.47 % 123.52 % 27.05 % Equatorial Guinea
2010s 105.89 % 147.69 % 41.81 % Equatorial Guinea
2020s 101.8 % 144.59 % 42.8 % Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 141.58 % against 97.44 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
44.14 %, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 8th of 18 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-nitrogen-use-efficiency/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-nitrogen-use-efficiency/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/equatorial-guinea/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).