Dominica vs Hungary: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Dominica
- Hungary
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 97.13 % against 90.21 % in Hungary, a difference of 6.92 %.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Dominica ranks 25th and Hungary ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 4 and Hungary in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.98 % | 36.02 % | 15.04 % | Hungary |
| 1970s | 29.14 % | 29.11 % | 0.0349 % | Dominica |
| 1980s | 35.66 % | 34.22 % | 1.44 % | Dominica |
| 1990s | 27.68 % | 55.89 % | 28.21 % | Hungary |
| 2000s | 52.35 % | 59.92 % | 7.57 % | Hungary |
| 2010s | 70.87 % | 63.38 % | 7.49 % | Dominica |
| 2020s | 86.87 % | 62.17 % | 24.71 % | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Dominica or Hungary?
- Dominica, at 97.13 % against 90.21 % in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Dominica and Hungary?
- 6.92 %, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Hungary rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Dominica ranks 25th and Hungary ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).