Eastern Africa vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Eastern Africa
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 110.79 % against 58.06 % in Eastern Africa, a difference of 52.73 %.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.9 times Eastern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 18th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 32 groups.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.7 % | 73.94 % | 8.24 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 69.97 % | 114.56 % | 44.59 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 66.37 % | 113.55 % | 47.18 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 61.94 % | 123.72 % | 61.78 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Eastern Africa or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 110.79 % against 58.06 % in Eastern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Eastern Africa and Kazakhstan?
- 52.73 %, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Eastern Africa ranks 18th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).