Fiji vs Paraguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Fiji
- Paraguay
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 84.08 % against 81.48 % in Paraguay, a difference of 2.6 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 197.19 % | 82.22 % | 114.97 % | Fiji |
| 1970s | 126.07 % | 89.06 % | 37 % | Fiji |
| 1980s | 111.56 % | 83.33 % | 28.22 % | Fiji |
| 1990s | 112.5 % | 80.7 % | 31.8 % | Fiji |
| 2000s | 136.22 % | 73.69 % | 62.53 % | Fiji |
| 2010s | 88.91 % | 80.26 % | 8.65 % | Fiji |
| 2020s | 89.17 % | 78 % | 11.18 % | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Fiji or Paraguay?
- Fiji, at 84.08 % against 81.48 % in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Fiji and Paraguay?
- 2.6 %, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Paraguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Fiji ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).