Finland vs Mauritania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Finland
- Mauritania
How they compare
Finland currently reports 48.94 % against 48.78 % in Mauritania, a difference of 0.16 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 104th and Mauritania ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38.59 % | 30.62 % | 7.97 % | Finland |
| 1970s | 47.54 % | 20.19 % | 27.35 % | Finland |
| 1980s | 49.38 % | 26.84 % | 22.55 % | Finland |
| 1990s | 59.2 % | 25.78 % | 33.42 % | Finland |
| 2000s | 54.72 % | 26.99 % | 27.73 % | Finland |
| 2010s | 53.2 % | 35.46 % | 17.74 % | Finland |
| 2020s | 52.32 % | 44.3 % | 8.02 % | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Finland or Mauritania?
- Finland, at 48.94 % against 48.78 % in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Finland and Mauritania?
- 0.16 %, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Mauritania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Finland ranks 104th and Mauritania ranks 105th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).