Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Georgia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 21.4 % against 16.8 % in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 4.6 %.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Georgia ranks 179th and Saudi Arabia ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.23 % | 32.25 % | 2.01 % | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 32 % | 26.53 % | 5.47 % | Georgia |
| 2010s | 28.87 % | 16.81 % | 12.06 % | Georgia |
| 2020s | 21.63 % | 15.53 % | 6.1 % | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Georgia or Saudi Arabia?
- Georgia, at 21.4 % against 16.8 % in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
- 4.6 %, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Georgia ranks 179th and Saudi Arabia ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).