Germany vs Latvia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency

Germany
68.5 %
in 2023
Latvia
66.6 %
in 2023
Germany rank
61st
Latvia rank
64th

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time

  • Germany
  • Latvia
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 68.5 % against 66.6 % in Latvia, a difference of 1.9 %.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 64th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 43.21 % 36.96 % 6.26 % Germany
2000s 52.15 % 49.51 % 2.63 % Germany
2010s 54.41 % 61.68 % 7.28 % Latvia
2020s 67.16 % 68.36 % 1.2 % Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Germany or Latvia?
Germany, at 68.5 % against 66.6 % in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Germany and Latvia?
1.9 %, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Germany and Latvia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
Germany ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 64th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).