Guatemala vs Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Guatemala
- Guinea
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 63.96 % against 62.99 % in Guinea, a difference of 0.97 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.
Guatemala ranks 59th and Guinea ranks 60th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77.45 % | 67.4 % | 10.05 % | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 74.06 % | 66.4 % | 7.66 % | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 64.46 % | 70.35 % | 5.89 % | Guinea |
| 1990s | 54.63 % | 72.28 % | 17.66 % | Guinea |
| 2000s | 59.18 % | 80.8 % | 21.62 % | Guinea |
| 2010s | 62.66 % | 62.85 % | 0.1919 % | Guinea |
| 2020s | 60.32 % | 63.88 % | 3.57 % | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Guatemala or Guinea?
- Guatemala, at 63.96 % against 62.99 % in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Guatemala and Guinea?
- 0.97 %, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Guatemala ranks 59th and Guinea ranks 60th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).