Haiti vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Haiti
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 54.48 % against 54.13 % in Haiti, a difference of 0.35 %.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 69.88 % | 59.67 % | 10.21 % | Haiti |
| 1970s | 60.61 % | 57.5 % | 3.11 % | Haiti |
| 1980s | 79.45 % | 58.64 % | 20.8 % | Haiti |
| 1990s | 63.59 % | 51.52 % | 12.07 % | Haiti |
| 2000s | 48.29 % | 69.48 % | 21.19 % | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 50.88 % | 55.22 % | 4.34 % | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 52.93 % | 55.36 % | 2.44 % | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Haiti or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 54.48 % against 54.13 % in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 0.35 %, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Haiti ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).