Hungary vs Nigeria: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Hungary
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 93.36 % against 90.21 % in Hungary, a difference of 3.15 %.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 22nd and Nigeria ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36.02 % | 89.36 % | 53.34 % | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 29.11 % | 85.42 % | 56.32 % | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 34.22 % | 75.03 % | 40.81 % | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 55.89 % | 96.46 % | 40.57 % | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 59.92 % | 107.75 % | 47.83 % | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 63.38 % | 92.27 % | 28.89 % | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 62.17 % | 88.38 % | 26.22 % | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Hungary or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 93.36 % against 90.21 % in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Hungary and Nigeria?
- 3.15 %, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Nigeria rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Hungary ranks 22nd and Nigeria ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).