Japan vs North Macedonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Japan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 52.82 % against 51.48 % in Japan, a difference of 1.34 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.72 % | 30.67 % | 11.05 % | Japan |
| 2000s | 43.52 % | 42.49 % | 1.03 % | Japan |
| 2010s | 46.55 % | 43.73 % | 2.82 % | Japan |
| 2020s | 49.27 % | 51.55 % | 2.28 % | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Japan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 52.82 % against 51.48 % in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Japan and North Macedonia?
- 1.34 %, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Japan and North Macedonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Japan ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).