Kazakhstan vs Viet Nam: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Kazakhstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 110.79 % against 39 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 71.79 %.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.8 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73.94 % | 35.68 % | 38.26 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 114.56 % | 39.72 % | 74.84 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 113.55 % | 42.63 % | 70.91 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 123.72 % | 41.31 % | 82.41 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Kazakhstan or Viet Nam?
- Kazakhstan, at 110.79 % against 39 % in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Kazakhstan and Viet Nam?
- 71.79 %, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Viet Nam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Viet Nam rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).