Latvia vs Oman: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Latvia
- Oman
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 66.6 % against 65.07 % in Oman, a difference of 1.53 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Oman ahead.
Latvia ranks 53rd and Oman ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.96 % | 34.3 % | 2.65 % | Latvia |
| 2000s | 49.51 % | 36.84 % | 12.67 % | Latvia |
| 2010s | 61.68 % | 36.7 % | 24.98 % | Latvia |
| 2020s | 68.36 % | 64.78 % | 3.58 % | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Latvia or Oman?
- Latvia, at 66.6 % against 65.07 % in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Latvia and Oman?
- 1.53 %, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Latvia ranks 53rd and Oman ranks 56th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).