Lebanon vs Sudan (former): Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Lebanon
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 42.61 % against 42.46 % in Sudan (former), a difference of 0.15 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Lebanon ranks 127th and Sudan (former) ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37.53 % | 60.52 % | 22.99 % | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 25.32 % | 56.84 % | 31.52 % | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 31.1 % | 49.98 % | 18.88 % | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 43.94 % | 50.95 % | 7.02 % | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 41.4 % | 49.09 % | 7.69 % | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 34.14 % | 36.81 % | 2.67 % | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Lebanon or Sudan (former)?
- Lebanon, at 42.61 % against 42.46 % in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Lebanon and Sudan (former)?
- 0.15 %, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Lebanon and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Lebanon ranks 127th and Sudan (former) ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).