Malaysia vs Rwanda: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 77.13 % against 75.58 % in Rwanda, a difference of 1.55 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Malaysia ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 61.88 % | 99.63 % | 37.75 % | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 56.87 % | 100.02 % | 43.15 % | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 55.86 % | 103.25 % | 47.39 % | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 56.79 % | 96.15 % | 39.37 % | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 56.17 % | 93.69 % | 37.52 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 64.65 % | 80.01 % | 15.36 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 79.37 % | 73.09 % | 6.28 % | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Malaysia, at 77.13 % against 75.58 % in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 1.55 %, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Malaysia ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).