Mali vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Mali
- Türkiye
How they compare
Mali currently reports 105.6 % against 54.77 % in Türkiye, a difference of 50.83 %.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.9 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Mali ranks 15th and Türkiye ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 5 and Türkiye in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 79.92 % | 136.87 % | 56.95 % | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 74.91 % | 83.04 % | 8.13 % | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 99.61 % | 60.23 % | 39.38 % | Mali |
| 1990s | 109.02 % | 57.98 % | 51.04 % | Mali |
| 2000s | 81.71 % | 59.79 % | 21.92 % | Mali |
| 2010s | 88.84 % | 58.07 % | 30.78 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 100.37 % | 53.98 % | 46.39 % | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Mali or Türkiye?
- Mali, at 105.6 % against 54.77 % in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Mali and Türkiye?
- 50.83 %, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Mali ranks 15th and Türkiye ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).