Middle Africa vs Nauru: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Middle Africa
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 178 % against 78.16 % in Middle Africa, a difference of 99.84 %.
That makes Nauru's figure about 2.3 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 4th and Nauru ranks 7th of 32 groups.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 75.97 % | 263.62 % | 187.65 % | Nauru |
| 1970s | 65.27 % | 222.3 % | 157.02 % | Nauru |
| 1980s | 60.84 % | 179.72 % | 118.87 % | Nauru |
| 1990s | 66.7 % | 154.23 % | 87.53 % | Nauru |
| 2000s | 70.96 % | 179.56 % | 108.6 % | Nauru |
| 2010s | 77.9 % | 181.09 % | 103.19 % | Nauru |
| 2020s | 78.18 % | 177.53 % | 99.35 % | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Middle Africa or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 178 % against 78.16 % in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Middle Africa and Nauru?
- 99.84 %, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Nauru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Nauru rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Middle Africa ranks 4th and Nauru ranks 7th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).