Northern Africa vs Ukraine: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Northern Africa
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 102.75 % against 48.72 % in Northern Africa, a difference of 54.03 %.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 2.1 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Northern Africa ahead.
Northern Africa ranks 29th and Ukraine ranks 18th of 38 regions.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.7 % | 49.09 % | 1.4 % | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 46.06 % | 80.36 % | 34.3 % | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 51.08 % | 87.73 % | 36.65 % | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 48.95 % | 93.02 % | 44.08 % | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Northern Africa or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 102.75 % against 48.72 % in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Northern Africa and Ukraine?
- 54.03 %, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern Africa and Ukraine rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Northern Africa ranks 29th and Ukraine ranks 18th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).