Russian Federation vs Rwanda: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Russian Federation
- Rwanda
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 75.69 % against 75.58 % in Rwanda, a difference of 0.11 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Rwanda ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 47th and Rwanda ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.08 % | 94.31 % | 53.23 % | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 61.74 % | 93.69 % | 31.95 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 67.41 % | 80.01 % | 12.6 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 72.96 % | 73.09 % | 0.1316 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Russian Federation or Rwanda?
- Russian Federation, at 75.69 % against 75.58 % in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Russian Federation and Rwanda?
- 0.11 %, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Russian Federation ranks 47th and Rwanda ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).