Serbia vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency

Serbia
73.33 %
in 2023
Uganda
72.09 %
in 2023
Serbia rank
53rd
Uganda rank
56th

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time

  • Serbia
  • Uganda
255075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 73.33 % against 72.09 % in Uganda, a difference of 1.24 %.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Uganda ahead.

Serbia ranks 53rd and Uganda ranks 56th of 201 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 52.6 % 76.88 % 24.28 % Uganda
2010s 64.15 % 70.53 % 6.38 % Uganda
2020s 69.5 % 76.36 % 6.86 % Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Serbia or Uganda?
Serbia, at 73.33 % against 72.09 % in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Serbia and Uganda?
1.24 %, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uganda?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
Serbia ranks 53rd and Uganda ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).