Yugoslav SFR vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Yugoslav SFR
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 54.69 % against 54.48 % in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.21 %.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Yugoslav SFR ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Yugoslav SFR | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41.42 % | 59.67 % | 18.25 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 36.88 % | 57.5 % | 20.62 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 34.7 % | 58.64 % | 23.95 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 44.92 % | 55.29 % | 10.37 % | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency, Yugoslav SFR or Zimbabwe?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 54.69 % against 54.48 % in Zimbabwe as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency between Yugoslav SFR and Zimbabwe?
- 0.21 %, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Yugoslav SFR and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Yugoslav SFR and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen use efficiency?
- Yugoslav SFR ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).