Australia vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Australia
- Malawi
How they compare
Australia currently reports 480,744 t against 314,983 t in Malawi, a difference of 165,761 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.5 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Australia ranks 30th and Malawi ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -103,909 t | 17,305 t | 121,214 t | Malawi |
| 1970s | -80,620 t | 25,824 t | 106,443 t | Malawi |
| 1980s | -58,793 t | 31,387 t | 90,180 t | Malawi |
| 1990s | 195,418 t | 33,176 t | 162,242 t | Australia |
| 2000s | 250,528 t | 69,697 t | 180,831 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 410,030 t | 129,135 t | 280,894 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 671,609 t | 227,282 t | 444,328 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Australia or Malawi?
- Australia, at 480,744 t against 314,983 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Australia and Malawi?
- 165,761 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Malawi rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Australia ranks 30th and Malawi ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).