Belarus vs Western Asia: Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Western Asia
How they compare
Western Asia currently reports 1.62 million t against 570,357 t in Belarus, a difference of 1.05 million t.
That makes Western Asia's figure about 2.8 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Western Asia has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 24th and Western Asia ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Western Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 422,077 t | 1.34 million t | 922,444 t | Western Asia |
| 2000s | 472,348 t | 1.29 million t | 821,386 t | Western Asia |
| 2010s | 548,868 t | 1.30 million t | 750,991 t | Western Asia |
| 2020s | 536,135 t | 1.53 million t | 995,610 t | Western Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Western Asia?
- Western Asia, at 1.62 million t against 570,357 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Western Asia?
- 1.05 million t, with Western Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Western Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Western Asia rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 24th and Western Asia ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).