Bhutan vs Luxembourg: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen

Bhutan
2,212 t
in 2023
Luxembourg
3,698 t
in 2023
Bhutan rank
155th
Luxembourg rank
152nd

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Bhutan
  • Luxembourg
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 3,698 t against 2,212 t in Bhutan, a difference of 1,486 t.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.7 times Bhutan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 155th and Luxembourg ranks 152nd of 201 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 2,192 t 5,042 t 2,849 t Luxembourg
2010s 1,824 t 5,181 t 3,357 t Luxembourg
2020s 2,396 t 4,216 t 1,820 t Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Bhutan or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 3,698 t against 2,212 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Bhutan and Luxembourg?
1,486 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Luxembourg rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
Bhutan ranks 155th and Luxembourg ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).