Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burundi: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burundi
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 30,423 t against 29,492 t in Burundi, a difference of 931 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th and Burundi ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24,623 t | 2,695 t | 21,928 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 42,745 t | 128.94 t | 42,616 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 73,209 t | 11,175 t | 62,034 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 40,096 t | 24,356 t | 15,740 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Burundi?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 30,423 t against 29,492 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burundi?
- 931 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burundi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burundi rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th and Burundi ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).