Botswana vs Cuba: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Botswana
- Cuba
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 18,595 t against 15,931 t in Cuba, a difference of 2,664 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,757 t | 17,583 t | 12,826 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 5,574 t | 29,579 t | 24,006 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 5,690 t | 119,195 t | 113,505 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 4,908 t | 41,754 t | 36,847 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 10,787 t | 8,001 t | 2,786 t | Botswana |
| 2010s | 15,968 t | 30,565 t | 14,597 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 16,394 t | 16,776 t | 382.03 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Botswana or Cuba?
- Botswana, at 18,595 t against 15,931 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Botswana and Cuba?
- 2,664 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Cuba rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Botswana ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).