Cabo Verde vs Congo: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2,328 t against 2,187 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 141 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 156th and Congo ranks 154th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 4 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 445.68 t | 936.54 t | 490.87 t | Congo |
| 1970s | 462.05 t | 2,382 t | 1,920 t | Congo |
| 1980s | 1,569 t | 1,328 t | 240.94 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1990s | 3,131 t | 2,424 t | 706.57 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 2,671 t | 2,545 t | 126.36 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 2,126 t | 1,613 t | 512.75 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 2,164 t | 3,138 t | 974.32 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Congo?
- Congo, at 2,328 t against 2,187 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Congo?
- 141 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Congo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Congo rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 156th and Congo ranks 154th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).