Cameroon vs Mauritania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cameroon
- Mauritania
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 10,247 t against 9,724 t in Mauritania, a difference of 523 t.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 201 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,064 t | 4,702 t | 19,361 t | Cameroon |
| 1970s | 47,937 t | 5,527 t | 42,410 t | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 71,529 t | 5,878 t | 65,651 t | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 56,499 t | 10,097 t | 46,403 t | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 43,843 t | 10,620 t | 33,224 t | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 25,914 t | 11,334 t | 14,580 t | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 18,898 t | 10,832 t | 8,066 t | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Cameroon or Mauritania?
- Cameroon, at 10,247 t against 9,724 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Cameroon and Mauritania?
- 523 t, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Mauritania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Cameroon ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).