Caribbean vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Caribbean
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 314,983 t against 35,763 t in Caribbean, a difference of 279,220 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 8.8 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Caribbean ranks 27th and Malawi ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,490 t | 17,305 t | 5,815 t | Malawi |
| 1970s | 73,664 t | 25,824 t | 47,840 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 168,482 t | 31,387 t | 137,095 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 131,156 t | 33,176 t | 97,980 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 102,832 t | 69,697 t | 33,135 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 129,762 t | 129,135 t | 626.56 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 84,545 t | 227,282 t | 142,737 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Caribbean or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 314,983 t against 35,763 t in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Caribbean and Malawi?
- 279,220 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Malawi rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Caribbean ranks 27th and Malawi ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).