Central African Republic vs Estonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central African Republic
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 33,491 t against 32,113 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 1,378 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27,801 t | 34,505 t | 6,704 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 31,938 t | 22,264 t | 9,674 t | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 29,055 t | 28,933 t | 121.35 t | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 35,665 t | 31,366 t | 4,299 t | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Central African Republic or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 33,491 t against 32,113 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Central African Republic and Estonia?
- 1,378 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Estonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Central African Republic ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).