Central Asia vs Turkmenistan: Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central Asia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 1.40 million t against 516,470 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 887,600 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 2.7 times Turkmenistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 15th and Turkmenistan ranks 23rd of 38 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 706,777 t | 65,227 t | 641,549 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 502,022 t | 144,652 t | 357,369 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 945,372 t | 361,081 t | 584,291 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 1.24 million t | 443,449 t | 796,006 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen, Central Asia or Turkmenistan?
- Central Asia, at 1.40 million t against 516,470 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen between Central Asia and Turkmenistan?
- 887,600 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Turkmenistan rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen?
- Central Asia ranks 15th and Turkmenistan ranks 23rd of 38 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).