Chile vs Paraguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- Paraguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 177,784 t against 162,284 t in Paraguay, a difference of 15,500 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 52nd and Paraguay ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,228 t | 4,225 t | 13,003 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 35,987 t | 6,837 t | 29,150 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 67,922 t | 22,964 t | 44,958 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 154,173 t | 44,554 t | 109,619 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 185,705 t | 111,916 t | 73,789 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 166,315 t | 149,249 t | 17,066 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 167,787 t | 175,872 t | 8,085 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Paraguay?
- Chile, at 177,784 t against 162,284 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Paraguay?
- 15,500 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 52nd and Paraguay ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).