Costa Rica vs Tajikistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 87,721 t against 84,676 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 3,045 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 70th and Tajikistan ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 76,378 t | 36,654 t | 39,724 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 62,733 t | 4,938 t | 57,795 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 90,609 t | 24,116 t | 66,493 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 89,490 t | 69,812 t | 19,678 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Tajikistan?
- Costa Rica, at 87,721 t against 84,676 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Tajikistan?
- 3,045 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Tajikistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 70th and Tajikistan ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).