Côte d'Ivoire vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 309,276 t against -26,768 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 336,044 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 11.6 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 31st of 29 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 477.66 t | 335,299 t | 334,821 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 208.82 t | 493,423 t | 493,214 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -16,802 t | 608,718 t | 625,521 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | -16,935 t | 430,466 t | 447,401 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Côte d'Ivoire or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 309,276 t against -26,768 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Côte d'Ivoire and Yugoslav SFR?
- 336,044 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 31st of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).