Croatia vs Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen

Croatia
81,882 t
in 2023
Guinea
82,902 t
in 2023
Croatia rank
81st
Guinea rank
79th

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Croatia
  • Guinea
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 82,902 t against 81,882 t in Croatia, a difference of 1,020 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 81st and Guinea ranks 79th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 105,588 t 15,905 t 89,683 t Croatia
2000s 118,543 t 13,887 t 104,656 t Croatia
2010s 81,710 t 52,812 t 28,898 t Croatia
2020s 71,618 t 73,147 t 1,529 t Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Guinea?
Guinea, at 82,902 t against 81,882 t in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Guinea?
1,020 t, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
Croatia ranks 81st and Guinea ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).