Cuba vs Lebanon: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 16,170 t against 15,931 t in Cuba, a difference of 239 t.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Cuba ranks 125th and Lebanon ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,583 t | 9,506 t | 8,077 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 29,579 t | 19,789 t | 9,790 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 119,195 t | 15,239 t | 103,956 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 41,754 t | 16,392 t | 25,362 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 8,001 t | 18,445 t | 10,445 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 30,565 t | 21,718 t | 8,847 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 16,776 t | 13,422 t | 3,355 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 16,170 t against 15,931 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Lebanon?
- 239 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Lebanon rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 125th and Lebanon ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).