Cuba vs North Macedonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 15,931 t against 12,906 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 3,025 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Cuba ranks 125th and North Macedonia ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40,673 t | 38,257 t | 2,416 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 8,001 t | 21,021 t | 13,021 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 30,565 t | 20,324 t | 10,241 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 16,776 t | 15,204 t | 1,573 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or North Macedonia?
- Cuba, at 15,931 t against 12,906 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 3,025 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 125th and North Macedonia ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).