Czechia vs Ecuador: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 158,047 t against 155,772 t in Czechia, a difference of 2,275 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 58th and Ecuador ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 229,113 t | 111,166 t | 117,947 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 209,756 t | 156,267 t | 53,489 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 251,480 t | 202,352 t | 49,129 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 182,316 t | 191,263 t | 8,946 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 158,047 t against 155,772 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Ecuador?
- 2,275 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ecuador?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Ecuador rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 58th and Ecuador ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).